- All
- Agile
- Agile ALM
- Agile Marketing
- Agile Metrics
- Agile Tool
- AI
- ALM
- ALM Tools
- Application Lifecycle Management
- Application Portfolio Management
- Artificial Intelligence
- Blogs
- Bytes
- Capacity Planning
- Collaboration
- Essential SAFe
- Everyday Kanban
- Hybrid Agile
- Kanban
- Kanban board
- Kanban cycles
- Kanban for Distributed Teams
- Kanban Tool
- Leadership
- Lean
- Lean ALM
- Lean Software Development
- Lean SSC
- Lean/ Kanban
- Management
- Modern Management
- News and Events
- Newsletter
- Portfolio Kanban
- Portfolio Management
- PPM
- Product Updates
- Product Webinars
- Project Management
- Remote Working
- Requirements Management
- SAFe
- Scaled Agile ALM
- SwiftEnterprise
- SwiftEnterprise Updates
- Uncategorized
- Visual Management
- Visualization
- Webinars
- WIP
February 11, 2014
This is a common dilemma for teams wanting to use Kanban for 'fixed price, fixed cost" projects. On the one hand, you have a business demand to commit up-front to a timeline and scope (and cost) to deliver a product; on the other hand, you have a promising tool – Kanban – that completely does away with any concept of time (or scope) bucketing but yet promises higher value and better quality to the customer.
January 20, 2014
Projects are often executed by dynamic teams. They start with a small core team and as the project gains momentum, add resources over time. This is commonly seen in IT service organizations that do fixed price projects. Fixed price projects have a defined scope that needs to be delivered within a contracted budget and within a negotiated timeline. For the purpose of this experience report, “Dynamic teams” or “Fixed Price projects” will be used interchangeably.